Up coming, i determined the potential association anywhere between this type of parameters and you may sociocultural points, by creating Chisquared evaluating

شکل
شکل
شکل
شکل
شکل
شکل
شکل
شکل

Up coming, i determined the potential association anywhere between this type of parameters and you may sociocultural points, by creating Chisquared evaluating

To help you compare the second theory, i very first recoded, for each of the items into the standing measure, brand new part of solutions one sitios swinger gratis to reveal when the husbands reduce, equal or more scores, particularly, position, with hypogamy, which means that husbands enjoys all the way down standing than just spouses, homogamy, meaning equal status, and you can hypergamy, meaning husbands which have high standing than just wives. Toward possible relationship out-of country, analyses were tall within the degree (X 2 =11.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you can financial impact from a possible separation and divorce (X 2 =9.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Analysis indicated that, to possess Spanish users, there is certainly so much more studies hypogamy, whereas to own Dominican professionals there can be a whole lot more degree homogamy. Towards financial facts if there is separation and divorce, while there is far more homogamy getting Spanish players, discover a whole lot more hypergamy for Dominicans (find Profile 1).

With previous marriages or otherwise not wasn’t associated so you’re able to differences in updates. Towards possible association between position and you may decades married, high contacts was utilized in fitness (X 2 =fourteen.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), and even though for lovers y is present (40.4%, each), to have partners y exists (43.4%). This basically means, towards class with years married, husbands have down health updates. With youngsters off previous failed marriages and achieving children from newest wedding did not significantly connect with updates.

Within the contribution, the brand new analyses concerning next theory revealed that in contrast to our very own standards, the greatest feature relevant so you’re able to reputation ‘s the nation.

Univariate evaluating shown high differences in basis step one (F=5

To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).

Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.

Eventually, hypogamy points for the The country of spain obtained notably less than hypogamy circumstances in the Dominican Republic

Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.

Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد.